News · GDPRhub EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

CJEU - C-667/21 - Krankenversicherung Nordrhein

Liability Controllers
Jul 23, 2026 Source

How it connects

References

Related across sources

Case Law TSJ PV - 1713/2026 High Court of Justice of the Basque Country Case Law CJEU - C-526/24 - Brillen Rottler GDPRhub Literature The Court of Justice on the Excessiveness of Access Requests under the GDPR European Journal of Risk Regulation Case Law AG Arnsberg - 42 C 434/23 Local Court Arnsberg Enforcement VDAI (Lithuania) - 3R-1143 VDAI (Lithuania) Case Law Cass.Civ. - 15625/2026 Supreme Court

Full text

The CJEU decided that non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR are limited to moneteray compensation, presuppose causation from the controller and do not take into account the fault of the controller when calculating the amount of compensation awarded for a non-material damage. The CJEU decided that non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR fulfil a compensatory function, presuppose causation from the controller and do not take into account the fault of the controller when calculating the amount of compensation awarded for a non-material damage. English Summary. English Summary On the topic of non-material damagesOn the topic of non-material damages On the fourth question, Article 82(1) GDPR has a compensatory instead of deterrant or penalising function. Compensation is limited to monetary compensation and should fully compensate the damage suffered caused by the infraction of the GDPR. The Court reffered to the established case law that compensation can only be required based on Ar

Original document at the source gdprhub.eu

Similar Content