Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Scanshare s.r.l.: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security

According to the data protection authority, personal information about participants in a public competition had been unlawfully disclosed online.

€60,000 Fine
Scanshare s.r.l.
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 9 GDPR Art. 32 GDPR
Controllers Processors Personal Data Security Healthcare
Sep 30, 2020 Source garanteprivacy.it

Full text

According to the data protection authority, personal information about participants in a public competition had been unlawfully disclosed online. The reason for this was that, due to a configuration error, a list of the codes assigned to the candidates was temporarily accessible on the platform, which allowed access to the documents submitted by the candidates with their personal data. This was a violation of the principle of protection of information security for which Scanshare - which was the processor of the data on behalf of the controller 'Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale 'Antonio Cardarelli'' (a private hospital) - had been fined with EUR 60.000. [Also see the main fine on the hospital!]

Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

References

Related across sources

C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… CJEU ·Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
Guidelines 07/2020 concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR Guidelines ·EDPB Jul 7, 2021 Controllers Processors IP Address
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
C-136/17 GC and Others v CNIL C-136/17 (GC and Others) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Right to be Forgotten Legitimate Interest Criminal Data
S 5 SF 65/24 DS SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR The data subject (a child born in 2018), represented by her parents, was insured with the controller (a statutory health insurance provider) and participated in its digital bonus… Social Court Nuremberg Jun 10, 2026 Processors Controllers Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield Supervision IP Address
Related documents