Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Ordine degli Assistenti Sociali della Regione Lazio: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 2,000 on Ordine degli Assistenti Sociali della Regione Lazio.

€2,000 Fine
Ordine degli Assistenti Sociali della Regione Lazio
ITALY
Art. 12 GDPR
Personal Data Controllers Supervisory Authorities Public Authority
Dec 17, 2020 Source garanteprivacy.it

Full text

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 2,000 on Ordine degli Assistenti Sociali della Regione Lazio. On November 27, 2019, a data subject had sent an email to the controller requesting what data was being processed regarding him and his daughters. After initially receiving no response to his request for information, on January 10, 2020, the data subject filed a complaint against the controller with the Italian DPA. His request for information was subsequentely complied with on June 17, 2020, but without explaining the delay and, in particular, the initial non-response to the request.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

How it connects

References

Related across sources

C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-638/23 Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde In Case C-638/23, the Court of Justice interpreted Article 4(7) GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof in proceedings between the Amt… Eighth Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Public Authority Controllers Personal Data
C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-604/22 IAB Europe v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In Case C-604/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal in proceedings between IAB Europe and the Belgian… Fourth Chamber Mar 7, 2024 IP Address Controllers Personal Data
Related documents