Skip to content
Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l.: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Italian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 70,000 on the healthcare facility Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l..

€70,000 Fine
Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l.
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 9 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Italian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 70,000 on the healthcare facility Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l.. The hospital had reported two data breaches to the DPA under Art. 33 GDPR. In the first case, the neurology department of the hospital had sent a newsletter in an open distribution list, which resulted in the email addresses of the recipients being visible to all recipients. Of the 499 email addresses affected, 321 email addresses related to patients and 46 related to family members/caregivers of patients, which allowed these individuals to be identified by name. In the second case, a surgical department had sent a newsletter in an open distribution list, so again the recipients' email addresses were visible to all recipients. Of the 90 e-mail addresses affected, 75 e-mail addresses referred to patients and/or family members/caregivers of the patients, which meant that these individuals could be identified by name.

§

The DPA considered this to be a violation of the principle of 'integrity and confidentiality,' which requires that personal data be processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security, including protection against unauthorized or unlawful processing and against accidental loss, destruction or damage by appropriate technical and organizational measures. With regard to the calculation of the fine, the DPA took into aggravating account the fact that the data breach also affected data relating to the health of the persons concerned. The fact that the hospital had introduced measures to prevent such events in the future and had cooperated to a high degree with the DPA was taken into beneficial consideration. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 9 GDPR Industry: Health Care

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-667/21 ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts The CJEU (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Bundesarbeitsgericht in a case where ZQ sought compensation from his employer, Medizinischer Dienst der… CJEU ·Third Chamber Dec 21, 2023 Health Data Healthcare Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-741/21 GP v juris GmbH In Case C-741/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) addressed a preliminary reference from the Landgericht Saarbrücken in proceedings between data subject… CJEU ·Third Chamber Apr 11, 2024 Liability Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Data Breaches
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data