Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
CJEU: Mandatory publication of CAP beneficiaries' personal data violates proportionality
Original title: VOLKER UND MARKUS SCHECKE GBR V. LAND HESSEN, EIFERT V. LAND HESSEN AND BUNDESANSTALT FUR LANDWIRTSCHAFT UND ERNAHRUNG, 9.Nov.2010 (“SCHECKE”)
Judgment
Summary
Interference with the fundamental rights of privacy and data protection: Chapter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) Article 52(1) accepts that limitations may be imposed on fundamental rights, as long as they are provided by law, respect the essence of those rights and are proportionate (necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognized by the EU or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.) The CJEU concluded that by imposing an obligation to publish personal data rel
Full text
summary
Interference with the fundamental rights of privacy and data protection: Chapter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) Article 52(1) accepts that limitations may be imposed on fundamental rights, as long as they are provided by law, respect the essence of those rights and are proportionate (necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognized by the EU or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.) The CJEU concluded that by imposing an obligation to publish personal data relating to each natural person who was a beneficiary of aid from certain agricultural funds without drawing a distinction based on relevant criteria, such as the periods during which those persons received such aid, the frequency of such aid or the nature and amount thereof, the Council and the Commission had exceeded the limits imposed by the principle of proportionality. In this case, the interference is not proportionate as “there is nothing to show that lawmakers made an effort to strike a balance” with respect to the data of natural persons.
¶76 excerpt
As to whether the measure is necessary, it must be recalled that the objective of the publication at issue may not be pursued without having regard to the fact that that objective must be reconciled with the fundamental rights set forth in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter (see, to that effect, Case C‑73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi and Satamedia [2008] ECR I‑9831, paragraph 53).
¶77 excerpt
It is thus necessary to determine whether the Council of the European Union and the Commission balanced the European Union’s interest in guaranteeing the transparency of its acts and ensuring the best use of public funds against the interference with the right of the beneficiaries concerned to respect for their private life in general and to the protection of their personal data in particular. The Court has held in this respect that derogations and limitations in relation to the protection of personal data must apply only in so far as is strictly necessary (Satakunnan Markkinapörssi and Satamedia, paragraph 56).
How it connects
Related across sources
2018 Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) Guidelines on transparency Apr 11, 2018 Transparency Information Provision Modalities and Communication Methods Fairness & Transparency
Guidelines 01/2022 data subject rights - Right of access Guidelines Apr 17, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Rectification
Guidelines 5/2019 criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1) Guidelines Jul 7, 2020 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Rectification
Guidelines 1/2020 processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications Guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines Jan 28, 2020 Personal Data Privacy by Design & Default Processing
Guidelines 10/2020 restrictions under Article 23 GDPR Guidelines Oct 13, 2021 GDPR Subject-Matter and Objectives Right to Restriction Data Portability
Guidelines 06/2020 interplay of the Second Payment Services Directive and the GDPR Guidelines on the Interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provisions on international transfers as per Chapter V of the GDPR Guidelines Dec 15, 2020 International Transfer GDPR Article 5 Principles of Processing Personal Data