Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

SERGEJS BUIVIDS v. THE AUGSTĀKĀ TIESA

C-345/17 Case
CJEU
Material scope
AG Opinion
Personal Data Special Categories of Data Material scope (GDPR) Recipient Processing Security Law Enforcement
Feb 14, 2019 Source
Summary

Interpretation: The exceptions to material scope of the Data Protection Directive (activities outside of EU law/processing operations “which concern public security, defense, State security and the activities of the State in areas of criminal law” + the household exception) must be interpreted narrowly but the derogation related to ‘journalistic activities’ must be interpreted broadly. Processing for Journalistic Purposes: ‘Journalistic activities’ are those which have as their purpose the disc

How it connects

2 of 3 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓

References

Cited by

Related across sources

Literature If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation Computer law & security review Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) EDPB Guidance Guidelines 07/2022 on certification as a tool for transfers EDPB News De Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens publiceert een rapport over de risicoanalyse van de AVG (Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming). AEPD Guidance EDPB Annual Report 2021 EDPB Guidance Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article 23 GDPR EDPB

Full text 3 paragraphs

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline Original at the source →
¶53

It follows from the Court’s case-law that ‘journalistic activities’ are those which have as their purpose the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas, irrespective of the medium which is used to transmit them (see, to that effect, judgment of

Recipient
¶69

In the light of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the second question is that Article 9 of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that factual circumstances such as those of the case in the main proceedings, that is to say, the video recording of police officers in a police station, while a statement is being made, and the publication of that recorded video on a video website, on which users can send, watch and share videos, may constitute a processing of personal data solely for journalistic purposes, within the meaning of that provision, in so far as it is apparent from that video that the sole object of that recording and publication thereof is the disclosure of information, opinions or ideas to the public, this being a matter which it is for the referring court to determine.

Personal Data Processing applies Art. 9
¶16

July 2015, ClientEarth and PAN Europe v EFSA, C‑615/13 P, EU:C:2015:489, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).

Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu

Similar Content