Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
SMARANDA BARA ET AL. V. PRESEDINTELE CASEI NATIONALE DE ASIGURARI DE SANATATE (CNAS) ET AL., 1.10.2015 (“BARA”)
Summary
Personal data: Tax data transferred are personal data, since they are “information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.” (¶ 29)
How it connects
References
- TIETOSUOJAVALTUUTETTU [FINNISH DATA PROTECTION OMBUDSMAN] V. SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY, 16.12.2008 (“SATAKUNNAN&SATAMEDIA”)
- MINISTER VOOR IMMIGRATIE V. M, 17.7.2014 (“Minister v. M”)
- Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV
- Art. 2
- Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- SERGEJS BUIVIDS v. THE AUGSTĀKĀ TIESA
- CLIENT EARTH ET AL. V. EFSA, 16.7.2015 (“CLIENT EARTH”)
- Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2017.#Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8 and 47 — Directive 95/46/EC — Articles 1, 7 and 13 — Processing of personal data — Article 4(3) TEU — Drawing up of a list of personal data — Subject matter — Ta
Related across sources
Guidance Guidelines 07/2022 on certification as a tool for transfers Guidance Guidelines 03/2022 on Deceptive design patterns in social media platform interfaces: how to recognise and avoid them News Danish SA Declares Use of Google Analytics Unlawful Without Supplementary Measures News Irish Data Protection Commissioner Fines Instagram EUR 405M for Children Privacy Violations News DeFine is a calculator for GDPR fines based on method of the EDPB Guidance Guidelines 02/2021 on virtual voice assistants
Full text
summary
Personal data: Tax data transferred are personal data, since they are “information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.” (¶ 29)
¶29 excerpt
In that regard, it must be held, on the basis of the information provided by the referring court, that the tax data transferred to the CNAS by the ANAF are personal data within the meaning of Article 2(a) of the directive, since they are ‘information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person’ (judgment in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi and Satamedia, C‑73/07, EU:C:2008:727, paragraph 35). Both the transfer of the data by the ANAF, the body responsible for the management of the database in which they are held, and their subsequent processing by the CNAS therefore constitute ‘processing of personal data’ within the meaning of Article 2(b) of the directive (see, to that effect, inter alia, judgments in Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others, C‑465/00, C‑138/01 and C‑139/01, EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 64, and Huber, C‑524/06, EU:C:2008:724, paragraph 43).
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu