Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
CJEU: Tax authority income data remains personal data despite prior public publication
SATAKUNNAN & SATAMEDIA
Original title: TIETOSUOJAVALTUUTETTU [FINNISH DATA PROTECTION OMBUDSMAN] V. SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY, 16.12.2008 (“SATAKUNNAN&SATAMEDIA”)
SATAKUNNAN & SATAMEDIA
Judgment
Full text
summary
Personal data: Surname, given name of certain natural persons whose income exceeds certain thresholds as well as the amount of their earned and unearned income constitute personal data. The fact the the information was made publicly available by a governmental agency and that is had already been published in unaltered form in the media does not exempt it from the scope of data protection law.
¶35 excerpt
It must be held that the data to which this question relates, which comprise the surname and given name of certain natural persons whose income exceeds certain thresholds as well as the amount, to the nearest EUR 100, of their earned and unearned income, constitute personal data within the meaning of Article 2(a) of the directive, since they constitute ‘information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person’ (see also Joined Cases C‑465/00, C‑138/01 and C‑139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others [2003] ECR I-4989, paragraph 64).
¶46 excerpt
Moreover, it should be pointed out that the directive does not lay down any further limitation of its scope of application.
¶47 excerpt
In that regard, the Advocate General observes at point 125 of her Opinion that Article 13 of the directive permits derogations from its provisions only in certain cases, which do not extend to the provisions of Article 3.
¶48 excerpt
Lastly, it must be held that a general derogation from the application of the directive in respect of published information would largely deprive the directive of its effect. It would be sufficient for the Member States to publish data in order for those data to cease to enjoy the protection afforded by the directive.
¶49 excerpt
The answer to the fourth question should therefore be that activities involving the processing of personal data such as those referred to at points (c) and (d) of the first question and relating to personal data files which contain solely, and in unaltered form, material that has already been published in the media, fall within the scope of application of the directive.
How it connects
Related across sources
Opinion 5/2021 EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) 1 Adopted EDPB - EDPS Joint Opinion 5 /2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmo nised rules on artificial i… Opinion Jun 18, 2021 Identification Biometric Data Accountability
2025 Study on the secondary use of personal data in the context of scientific research 2 This study has been prepared by Milieu under Contract No EDPS/2019/02 - 04 for the benefit of the EDPB. The study has been carried out by researchers from KU Leuven (CiTiP) and… EDPB Apr 3, 2025 Personal Data Statistics Scientific Research
Opinion 2/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework ( EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Opinion Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Notification Obligation Data Breaches
Guidelines 2/2020 articles 46 (2) (a) and 46 (3) (b) of Regulation 2016/679 for transfers of personal data between EEA and non-EEA public authorities and bodies Guidelines ·EDPB Dec 15, 2020 Personal Data Processing Agreement Privacy Shield
Opinion 2/2026 Proposal for a Directive amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision EDPB - EDPS JOINT OPINION 2 /2026 On the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Adopted on 1 0 February… Opinion ·EDPS Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Direct Marketing Data Breaches
Guidelines 2/2019 processing of personal data under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR in the context of the provision of online services to data subjects 1 Adopted Guidelines 2/2019 on the processing of personal data under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR in the context of the provision of online services to data subjects Version 2.0 8 October… Guidelines ·EDPB Oct 16, 2019 Personal Data Processing Child Consent