Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy
Summary
Right to Adequate Legal Remedy: Making the admissibility of a legal action brought by a person alleging infringement of his right to data protection subject to the prior exhaustion of the administrative remedies available does not violate Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU “provided that the practical arrangements for the exercise of such remedies do not disproportionately affect the right to an effective remedy before a court referred to in that article.” It is important,
How it connects
References
Related across sources
Literature If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation Guidance Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR Literature The data subject’s right to access to information under GDPR and the right of the data controller to protect its know-how Guidance Guidelines 04/2022 on the calculation of administrative fines under the GDPR Guidance Guidelines 03/2021 on the application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR Guidance Guidelines 8/2022 on identifying a controller or processor's lead supervisory authority
Full text
summary
Right to Adequate Legal Remedy: Making the admissibility of a legal action brought by a person alleging infringement of his right to data protection subject to the prior exhaustion of the administrative remedies available does not violate Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU “provided that the practical arrangements for the exercise of such remedies do not disproportionately affect the right to an effective remedy before a court referred to in that article.” It is important, in particular, that the prior exhaustion of the available administrative remedies does not lead to a “substantial delay” in bringing a legal action, that it involves the suspension of the limitation period of the rights concerned and that it “does not involve excessive costs”. (¶76)
¶76 excerpt
In the light of all the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question must be that Article 47 of the Charter must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation, which makes the exercise of a judicial remedy by a person stating that his right to protection of personal data guaranteed by Directive 95/46 has been infringed, subject to the prior exhaustion of the available administrative remedies, provided that the practical arrangements for the exercise of such remedies do not disproportionately affect the right to an effective remedy before a court referred to in that article. It is important, in particular, that the prior exhaustion of the available administrative remedies does not lead to a substantial delay in bringing a legal action, that it involves the suspension of the limitation period of the rights concerned and that it does not involve excessive costs.
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu