Skip to content
DSA Recital 123 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 123 — supervision by member state of establishment

In force — consolidated2022-10-27 · CELEX 02022R2065-20221027 · ELI ↗
Version history 1
  • 2022-10-27in force CELEX 02022R2065-20221027

In the interest of clarity, simplicity and effectiveness, the powers to supervise and enforce the obligations under this Regulation should be conferred to the competent authorities in the Member State where the main establishment of the provider of intermediary services is located, that is, where the provider has its head office or registered office within which the principal financial functions and operational control are exercised. In respect of providers that are not established in the Union, but that offer services in the Union and therefore fall within the scope of this Regulation, the Member State where those providers appointed their legal representative should have competence, considering the function of legal representatives under this Regulation. In the interest of the effective application of this Regulation, all Member States or the Commission, where applicable, should, however, have competence in respect of providers that failed to designate a legal representative. That competence may be exercised by any of the competent authorities or the Commission, provided that the provider is not subject to enforcement proceedings for the same facts by another competent authority or the Commission. In order to ensure that the principle of ne bis in idem is respected, and in particular to avoid that the same infringement of the obligations laid down in this Regulation is sanctioned more than once, each Member State that intends to exercise its competence in respect of such providers should, without undue delay, inform all other authorities, including the Commission, through the information sharing system established for the purpose of this Regulation.

Related across sources

C-507/17 Google LLC v CNIL C-507/17 (Google Territorial Scope) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Right to be Forgotten Right to Object Child Consent
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Telecommunications
Opinion 12/2024 “Code of Conduct for Service Providers in Clinical Research” submitted by EUCROF 1 Adopted Opinion 12 /202 4 on the draft decision of the French Supervisory Authority regarding the “ Code of Conduct for Service Providers in Clinical Research” submitted by… French SA ·Opinion ·EDPB Jun 18, 2024 Supervision Codes of Conduct Processors
29 K 3490/24 VG Düsseldorf: data subjects challenge district's sharing of personal data in water-law A district (the controller), acting as the lower water authority, initiated administrative proceedings after identifying unauthorised riverbank works and a private jetty on two… Administrative Court Düsseldorf Jun 22, 2026 Supervisory Authorities Supervision Integrity and Confidentiality Principle