News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

GDPR complaint against X (Twitter) over illegal micro-targeting for chat control ads

Political Opinions Advertising Practices and Requirements under DSA Social Media Marketing Religious Beliefs Monitoring Supervisory Authorities Types of Special Categories of Personal Data
Dec 14, 2023 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Case Law Meta Platforms v noyb CJEU Literature GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation on Sites Requiring Accessibility Innovative STEM Education Case Law Supreme Court upholds €300,000 fine against INPS for GDPR violations in COVID bonus data Supreme Court Case Law Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#OQ v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 22 – Automated individual decision-making – Credit information agencies – Automated establishment of a probability value concerning the ability of a person to meet payment commitments in the future (‘s Court of Justice of the European Union Guidance Guidelines 01/2022 on data subject rights - Right of access EDPB Guidance EDPB Annual Report 2022 EDPB

Full text

Political Microtargeting, Manipulation & Tracking Today, noyb filed a complaint against X (Twitter) for unlawfully using the political views and religious beliefs of its users for targeted advertising. The company used this specially protected data to determine whether people should or should not see an ad campaign by the EU Commission’s Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs, which tried to ralley support for the proposed “chat control” in the Netherlands. In November, this unlawful use of micro-targeting already prompted noyb to file a complaint against the EU Commission itself. Now, noyb follows up with a complaint against X. By enabling this practice in the first place, the company violated both the GDPR and the DSA. Complaint with the Dutch data protection authority (NL)Auto-translation of the complaint (EN)Complaint against the EU CommissionX abuses sensitive data for targeted ads. X (Twitter) harvests sensitive data such as political view and religious beliefs by mon

Original document at the source noyb.eu

Similar Content