DSA Recital 66 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 66 — Commission content moderation decisions database

Notice and Action Mechanisms under DSA Transparency Monitoring
In force — consolidated2022-10-27 · CELEX 02022R2065-20221027 · ELI ↗
Version history 1
  • 2022-10-27in force CELEX 02022R2065-20221027

In order to ensure transparency and to enable scrutiny over the content moderation decisions of the providers of online platforms and monitoring the spread of illegal content online, the Commission should maintain and publish a database which contains the decisions and statements of reasons of the providers of online platforms when they remove or otherwise restrict availability of and access to information. In order to keep the database continuously updated, the providers of online platforms should submit, in a standard format, the decisions and statement of reasons without undue delay after taking a decision, to allow for real-time updates where technically possible and proportionate to the means of the online platform in question. The structured database should allow access to, and queries for, the relevant information, in particular as regards the type of alleged illegal content at stake.

Related across sources

C-757/22 Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V In a preliminary ruling requested by the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 80(2) GDPR in the… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Jul 11, 2024 Personal Data Transparency Fairness & Transparency
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers
T-709/21 WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board WhatsApp Ireland Ltd sought annulment of EDPB Binding Decision 1/2021, which resolved disputes among supervisory authorities regarding the Irish DPC's draft decision on WhatsApp's… General Court ·Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition Dec 7, 2022 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Transparency
2018 Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) Guidelines on transparency EDPB Apr 11, 2018 Transparency Information Provision Modalities and Communication Methods Fairness & Transparency
2018 Article 29 Working Party - Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679 EDPB Apr 11, 2018 Transparency Fairness & Transparency Personal Data
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision