Skip to content
Content type · 480 documents in this view · 3,651 in total

Enforcement

Regulatory actions, fines, warnings, and enforcement decisions

451–480 of 480 sort newestlargest fineoldest
€6,000 Casa Gracio Operation: Non-compliance with general data processing principles The company used CCTV cameras in the premises of a hotel which also captured the public roads outside the hotel resulting in a violation of the so called principle of data… SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Retention Period IP Address Feb 25, 2020
€1,500 Cafetería Nagasaki: Insufficient legal basis for data processing The AEPD found that the Nagasaki Cafetería did not comply with its obligations under the GDPR, as it placed its surveillance cameras in such a way as to monitor the public space… SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5, 6 Video Surveillance Monitoring Processing Feb 4, 2020
€3,600 Zhang Bordeta 2006, S.L. (Store and Restaurant): Non-compliance with general data processing principles The store and restaurant owner installed a video surveillance system which, among others, also took pictures of the sidewalk and thus of the public space, which violates the… SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Jan 14, 2020
€15,000 Allseas Marine S.A.: Non-compliance with general data processing principles The data protection supervisory authority has fined the extent to which employee data are processed by a video surveillance system in the workplace, the fact that the introduction… GREECE ·HDPA ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Employees Monitoring Jan 13, 2020
€4,100 LIECHTENSTEIN DPA: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Unlawful operation of a video surveillance system. Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video Surveillance Monitoring Supervisory Authorities Jan 1, 2020
€10,000 Restaurant: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Excessive use of video surveillance in violation of the principle of data minimization. GERMANY ·Art. 5 ·Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Jan 1, 2020
€3,000 Restaurant: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Excessive use of video surveillance in violation of the principle of data minimization. GERMANY ·Art. 5 ·Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Jan 1, 2020
€1,600 Megastar SL: Non-compliance with general data processing principles The company operated a video surveillance system in which the observation angle of the cameras extended unnecessarily far into the public traffic area. Furthermore, no sign with… SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5, 13 Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Dec 10, 2019
€500 Homeowners Association: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security The association used video surveillance systems without proper information according to Art. 13 GDPR and without adequate security measures regarding the persons having access to… ROMANIA ·ANSPDCP ·Art. 32 Video Surveillance Security Monitoring Nov 29, 2019
€6,000 Sports Bar: Non-compliance with general data processing principles The sports bar operated a video surveillance system in which the observation angle of the cameras extended into the public traffic area. SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Nov 19, 2019
€5,000 Restaurant: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Excessive use of video surveillance in violation of the principle of data minimization. GERMANY ·Art. 5 ·Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Nov 1, 2019
€1,770 L. Sp. z o.o.: Non-compliance with general data processing principles The Polish DPA (UODO) imposed a fine of EUR 1,770 on L. Sp. z o.o. for the video surveillance of a residential community, which was not in compliance with the provisions of the… POLAND ·UODO ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Nov 1, 2019
€2,500 UTTIS INDUSTRIES SRL: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations The sanctions were applied to the controller because he could not prove that the data subjects were informed about the processing of personal data / images through the video… ROMANIA ·ANSPDCP ·Art. 5, 6, 12 +1 Video Surveillance Personal Data Monitoring Oct 17, 2019
€15,100 Town of Kerepes: Insufficient legal basis for data processing The city based its video surveillance practice on its legitimate interests (Art. 6 (1) f GDPR). However, accordingt to Art. 6 (1) subparagraph 2 this legal basis shall not apply… HUNGARY ·NAIH ·Art. 6 Video Surveillance Legitimate Interest Public Authority Oct 1, 2019
CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação 2019/494 In its Opinion 20/2018 concerning the draft of Law 58/2019 which ensures the implementation of the GDPR in the portuguese national legal framework, the DPA drew the attention of… Deliberação 2019/494 ·Art. 2, 3, 5 +8 Controllers Personal Data Processing Sep 3, 2019
€1,121 Private enforcement agent: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights The fine of EUR 1, 121 was imposed on a private enforcement agent for processing of the personal data of data subject through recording by technical means for video surveillance… BULGARIA ·KZLD ·Art. 12, 15 Video Surveillance Personal Data Monitoring Sep 3, 2019
€18,630 School in Skellefteå: Insufficient legal basis for data processing A school in Skellefteå made a trial to use facial recognition technology. The fine was imposed against the school which had used facial recognition technology to monitor the… SWEDEN ·Art. 5, 9, 35 +1 ·Insufficient legal basis for data processing Biometric Data Biometric Data Monitoring Aug 20, 2019
€4,290 Public area maintenance company: Non-compliance with general data processing principles An ex-employee complained that his employer unlawfully monitored his work by its CCTV. The employer argued that CCTV monitoring was necessary to assess, whether the employee… HUNGARY ·NAIH ·Art. 5, 6, 13 Monitoring Video Surveillance Audit Logs Aug 2, 2019
€20,000 Employer UNIONTRAD COMPANY: Insufficient legal basis for data processing Between 2013 and 2017, the CNIL received complaints from several employees of the company who were filmed at their workstation. On two occasions, it alerted the company to the… FRANCE ·CNIL ·Art. 5, 12, 13 +1 Video Surveillance Employees Processing Jun 13, 2019
€2,000 Local bank: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights Customer of a local bank requested access to telephone conversation recordings as well as to CCTV recordings. The bank provided the copies of the recordings of telephone… HUNGARY ·NAIH ·Art. 12, 15, 18 Video Surveillance Personal Data Insurance May 31, 2019
€2,000 PORTUGAL DPA: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations Inexistence of signalization regarding the use of CCTV systems CNPD ·Art. 13 ·Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations Video Surveillance Supervisory Authorities Processing Agreement Mar 25, 2019
€2,000 PORTUGAL DPA: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations Inexistence of signalization regarding the use of CCTV systems CNPD ·Art. 13 ·Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations Video Surveillance Processing Agreement Supervisory Authorities Mar 19, 2019
€20,000 Employer: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video surveillance cameras have not only been used to protect property, but have also monitored employees (violation of principle of data minimisation). SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Monitoring Retention Period Jan 1, 2019
€2,000 Restaurant: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video surveillance cameras have been used in violation of principle of data minimisation (monitoring also of customer areas in restaurants). GERMANY ·Art. 5 ·Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video Surveillance Monitoring Audit Logs Jan 1, 2019
€9,000 Employer: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Video surveillance cameras have not only been used to protect property, but have also monitored employees (violation of principle of data minimisation). SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Monitoring Retention Period Jan 1, 2019
€3,600 AMADOR RECREATIVOS, S.L: Non-compliance with general data processing principles Surveillance of the public space by video surveillance cameras against violation of the principles of data minimisation. SPAIN ·aepd ·Art. 5 Video Surveillance Retention Period Monitoring Jan 1, 2019
€2,200 Private person: Insufficient legal basis for data processing The fine was imposed against a private person who was using CCTV at his home. The video surveillance covered areas which are intended for the general use of the residents of the… AUSTRIA ·dsb ·Art. 5, 6, 13 Video Surveillance Controllers Monitoring Dec 20, 2018
€3,200 HUNGARY DPA: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights The fine was imposed for (i) not providing a data subject with CCTV recordings, (ii) not retaining recordings for further use by the data subject, and (iii) not informing the data… NAIH ·Art. 12, 13, 15 +1 ·Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights Video Surveillance Personal Data Supervisory Authorities Dec 18, 2018
€4,800 Betting place: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations Video surveillance was not sufficiently marked and a large part of the sidewalk of the facility was recorded. Surveillance of the public space in this way, i.e. on a large scale… AUSTRIA ·dsb ·Art. 13 Video Surveillance Monitoring Supervisory Authorities Dec 9, 2018
€1,800 Kebab restaurant: Insufficient legal basis for data processing CCTV was unlawfully used. Sufficient information about the video surveillance was missing. In addition, the storage period of 14 days was too long and therefore against the… AUSTRIA ·dsb ·Art. 5, 13, 14 Video Surveillance Monitoring IP Address Jan 1, 2018