Skip to content
AI Act Art. 48 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

CE marking

In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712
  1. 1.

    The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.

  2. 2.

    For high-risk AI systems provided digitally, a digital CE marking shall be used, only if it can easily be accessed via the interface from which that system is accessed or via an easily accessible machine-readable code or other electronic means.

  3. 3.

    The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the high-risk AI system, it shall be affixed to the packaging or to the accompanying documentation, as appropriate.

  4. 4.

    Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43. The identification number of the notified body shall be affixed by the body itself or, under its instructions, by the provider or by the provider’s authorised representative. The identification number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that the high-risk AI system fulfils the requirements for CE marking.

  5. 5.

    Where high-risk AI systems are subject to other Union law which also provides for the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the high-risk AI system also fulfil the requirements of that other law.

Related across sources

Opinion 1/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital… Opinion Jan 21, 2026 Artificial Intelligence Entry Into Force Mutual Assistance Between Member States for AI Oversight
Opinion 5/2021 EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) 1 Adopted EDPB - EDPS Joint Opinion 5 /2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmo nised rules on artificial i… Opinion Jun 18, 2021 Identification Biometric Data Accountability
2026 General-Purpose AI under the EU AI Act: A Conceptual Allocation of Duties across the Value Chain Fabian Teichmann — SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society ·full text Jun 30, 2026 AI Governance Framework AI Impact Assessment AI Value Chain Actors and Roles
2025 Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI Vaios Bolgouras, Apostolis Zarras, Christian Leka, Ioannis Stylianou et al. — AI and Ethics AI and Ethics ·full text Jun 2, 2025 AI Governance Framework Infringement Reporting AI Provider Transparency