Amendments to Annex III

The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend Annex III by adding or modifying use-cases of high-risk AI systems where both of the following conditions are fulfilled:¶

1. a)
   the AI systems are intended to be used in any of the areas listed in Annex III; ¶

   High-Risk AI Classification Annex III Amendments
2. b)
   the AI systems pose a risk of harm to health and safety, or an adverse impact on fundamental rights, and that risk is equivalent to, or greater than, the risk of harm or of adverse impact posed by the high-risk AI systems already referred to in Annex III. ¶

   High-Risk AI Classification Annex III Amendments AI Risk Assessment

When assessing the condition under paragraph 1, point (b), the Commission shall take into account the following criteria:¶

1. a)
   the intended purpose of the AI system; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
2. b)
   the extent to which an AI system has been used or is likely to be used; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
3. c)
   the nature and amount of the data processed and used by the AI system, in particular whether special categories of personal data are processed; ¶

   Personal Data Special Categories of Data Artificial Intelligence
4. d)
   the extent to which the AI system acts autonomously and the possibility for a human to override a decision or recommendations that may lead to potential harm; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
5. e)
   the extent to which the use of an AI system has already caused harm to health and safety, has had an adverse impact on fundamental rights or has given rise to significant concerns in relation to the likelihood of such harm or adverse impact, as demonstrated, for example, by reports or documented allegations submitted to national competent authorities or by other reports, as appropriate; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence Authority Cooperation
6. f)
   the potential extent of such harm or such adverse impact, in particular in terms of its intensity and its ability to affect multiple persons or to disproportionately affect a particular group of persons; ¶
7. g)
   the extent to which persons who are potentially harmed or suffer an adverse impact are dependent on the outcome produced with an AI system, in particular because for practical or legal reasons it is not reasonably possible to opt-out from that outcome; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
8. h)
   the extent to which there is an imbalance of power, or the persons who are potentially harmed or suffer an adverse impact are in a vulnerable position in relation to the deployer of an AI system, in particular due to status, authority, knowledge, economic or social circumstances, or age; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
9. i)
   the extent to which the outcome produced involving an AI system is easily corrigible or reversible, taking into account the technical solutions available to correct or reverse it, whereby outcomes having an adverse impact on health, safety or fundamental rights, shall not be considered to be easily corrigible or reversible; ¶

   Artificial Intelligence
10. j)
    the magnitude and likelihood of benefit of the deployment of the AI system for individuals, groups, or society at large, including possible improvements in product safety; ¶

    Artificial Intelligence
11. k)
    the extent to which existing Union law provides for: ¶

The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend the list in Annex III by removing high-risk AI systems where both of the following conditions are fulfilled:¶

1. a)
   the high-risk AI system concerned no longer poses any significant risks to fundamental rights, health or safety, taking into account the criteria listed in paragraph 2; ¶

   High-Risk AI Classification Artificial Intelligence
2. b)
   the deletion does not decrease the overall level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights under Union law. ¶