AI Act Art. 42 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Presumption of conformity with certain requirements

Presumption of Conformity for AI Systems AI Standards
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712
  1. 1.

    High-risk AI systems that have been trained and tested on data reflecting the specific geographical, behavioural, contextual or functional setting within which they are intended to be used shall be presumed to comply with the relevant requirements laid down in Article 10(4).

    High-Risk AI Classification Annex III Amendments AI Risk Assessment
  2. 2.

    High-risk AI systems that have been certified or for which a statement of conformity has been issued under a cybersecurity scheme pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/881 and the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to comply with the cybersecurity requirements set out in Article 15 of this Regulation in so far as the cybersecurity certificate or statement of conformity or parts thereof cover those requirements.

    High-Risk AI Classification Annex III Amendments AI Risk Assessment

Related across sources

Guidelines 4/2019 Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 Guidelines on data protection by design and by default Guidelines ·EDPB Oct 20, 2020 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Default Privacy by Design
2026 If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation Dariusz Kloza, Laura Drechsler, Elora Fernandes, Arian Birth et al. — Computer law & security review Computer law & security review ·full text Jan 23, 2026 Right to Explanation Privacy by Design Privacy by Default
Opinion 1/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital… Opinion Jan 21, 2026 Artificial Intelligence Entry Into Force Mutual Assistance Between Member States for AI Oversight
Opinion 5/2021 EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) 1 Adopted EDPB - EDPS Joint Opinion 5 /2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmo nised rules on artificial i… Opinion Jun 18, 2021 Identification Biometric Data Accountability
Opinion 2/2026 Proposal for a Directive amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision EDPB - EDPS JOINT OPINION 2 /2026 On the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Adopted on 1 0 February… Opinion ·EDPS Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Direct Marketing Data Breaches
Opinion 2/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework ( EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Opinion Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Notification Obligation Data Breaches