AI Act Art. 90 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Alerts of systemic risks by the scientific panel

GPAI Systemic Risk AI Office Establishment and Role Identification
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712
  1. 1.

    The scientific panel may provide a qualified alert to the AI Office where it has reason to suspect that:

    AI Office Establishment and Role
    1. a)
      a general-purpose AI model poses concrete identifiable risk at Union level; or
      Identification GPAI Systemic Risk
    2. b)
      a general-purpose AI model meets the conditions referred to in Article 51.
      GPAI Systemic Risk
  2. 2.

    Upon such qualified alert, the Commission, through the AI Office and after having informed the Board, may exercise the powers laid down in this Section for the purpose of assessing the matter. The AI Office shall inform the Board of any measure according to Articles 91 to 94.

    AI Office Establishment and Role
  3. 3.

    A qualified alert shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:

    1. a)
      the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk concerned;
      GPAI Systemic Risk
    2. b)
      a description of the relevant facts and the reasons for the alert by the scientific panel;
    3. c)
      any other information that the scientific panel considers to be relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.