Skip to content
AI Act Art. 53 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models

In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712
  1. 1.

    Providers of general-purpose AI models shall:

    1. a)
      draw up and keep up-to-date the technical documentation of the model, including its training and testing process and the results of its evaluation, which shall contain, at a minimum, the information set out in Annex XI for the purpose of providing it, upon request, to the AI Office and the national competent authorities;
    2. b)
      draw up, keep up-to-date and make available information and documentation to providers of AI systems who intend to integrate the general-purpose AI model into their AI systems. Without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law, the information and documentation shall:
    3. c)
      put in place a policy to comply with Union law on copyright and related rights, and in particular to identify and comply with, including through state-of-the-art technologies, a reservation of rights expressed pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790;
    4. d)
      draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary about the content used for training of the general-purpose AI model, according to a template provided by the AI Office.
  2. 2.

    The obligations set out in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), shall not apply to providers of AI models that are released under a free and open-source licence that allows for the access, usage, modification, and distribution of the model, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are made publicly available. This exception shall not apply to general-purpose AI models with systemic risks.

  3. 3.

    Providers of general-purpose AI models shall cooperate as necessary with the Commission and the national competent authorities in the exercise of their competences and powers pursuant to this Regulation.

  4. 4.

    Providers of general-purpose AI models may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to the extent that those standards cover those obligations. Providers of general-purpose AI models who do not adhere to an approved code of practice or do not comply with a European harmonised standard shall demonstrate alternative adequate means of compliance for assessment by the Commission.

  5. 5.

    For the purpose of facilitating compliance with Annex XI, in particular points 2 (d) and (e) thereof, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to detail measurement and calculation methodologies with a view to allowing for comparable and verifiable documentation.

  6. 6.

    The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97(2) to amend Annexes XI and XII in light of evolving technological developments.

  7. 7.

    Any information or documentation obtained pursuant to this Article, including trade secrets, shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.

Related across sources

New Records Reveal Problems with Medicare’s AI Prior Authorization Experiment EFF sued the government back in March for information about the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) model, a new Medicare program that uses AI to evaluate prior… Sep 8, 2026 Access Controls AI Value Chain Actors and Roles Transparency
Advice from the AP to WordPress Users Affected by the Data Breach Recent zijn kwetsbaarheden ontdekt in de WordPress-software. WordPress wordt relatief veel gebruikt in Nederland. De kwetsbaarheden in WordPress worden momenteel actief misbruikt,… Aug 27, 2026 AI Value Chain Actors and Roles Data Breaches
Dutch DPA advises Twitch users: disable settings for data sharing with Amazon AI Streamingplatform Twitch heeft bekendgemaakt dat Amazon persoonsgegevens van Twitch-gebruikers gebruikt om AI-modellen mee te trainen. Gebruikers die niet willen dat Amazon hun… Aug 20, 2026 Personal Data AI Value Chain Actors and Roles
Farmers Are Getting Control Of Their Equipment Back For years, John Deere had actively made repairing their tractors near-impossible for anyone but itself and the few "authorized" repair shops—regardless of the ability of its… Jul 24, 2026 AI Value Chain Actors and Roles
Secret scoring: Join the CRIF class action now! Credit Scoring CRIF is one of the largest credit reference agencies in Austria. It has built up a largely unknown "shadow registry" containing the names, dates of birth and… Jun 9, 2026 AI Value Chain Actors and Roles
LinkedIn locks your GDPR rights behind a paywall Data Subject Rights LinkedIn tracks the visits to profile pages. However, if you want to see who has visited your own profile, you have to pay. The Microsoft subsidiary uses these… May 5, 2026 Social Media Right of Access Procedures Personal Data